January 1991, Page 34
How Can the Current Middle East Crisis Be Solved Peacefully?—Six
Views
Convene a UN-sponsored Conference Now
By George Thompson
If they could see George Bush now, our founding fathers would be
spinning in their graves. Witness this latest foray in the desert
to divert attention from conditions at home:
* Sending troops abroad, like the Hessians before us, threatening
to spill American blood for Kuwaiti oil.
* Knocking on foreign doors, begging money and/or troops
to wage a monarch's war.
* Being foolish enough to forgive loans to win allies for
war there when we owe so much for peace here.
* "Cozying up to [Syria's president] Hafez Al-Assad,
a proven terrorist, merely to gain support for the use of force
against Saddam Hussain." (Senator George Mitchell on TV.)
* Being unable to tell anybody—certainly not Americans—why
he was doing any of the above.
Enter Israel, cup in hand, biggest debtor of all: Chafing under
Bush's orders to "sit this one out," it wins whether peace
or war. But it gains most if we " remove" Saddam. That's
why its lobby here has been calling for war since the crisis began.
Led by pro-Israeli congressmen, columnists, former administration
officials and others, they cry, "Kill him for us now so we
don't have to do it later."
Aye, and there's the rub, for it is not the imminence of war that
should concern us. First, because it is obvious that Iraq will not
fight the forces arrayed now against it. Second, because by the
time these words appear Iraq will have released its hostages and
may well have begun withdrawing from Kuwait.
What should bother Americans most in this dubious duet in the desert
is being lied to. Bush since the invasion has been doing what his
predecessor did when faced with a "wimpy" image and/or
problems at home: Find a deplorable and vulnerable target abroad.
* Remember Grenada's airport runway it said it was building
"for tourists"? Washington said it was "for Russian
jets." We completed the runway—for tourists.
* Remember the Berlin blast that killed US servicemen? Washington
blamed Libya, but its Promised "irrefutable proof" never
surfaced.
* Remember the US-bound Libyan hit squads? When concrete
pillars were poured in front of the White House? When admitted Israeli
Mossad agent Manoucher Ghorbanifar revealed it was a hoax?
* Remember White House reaction to US downing of an Iranian
airbus over the Persian Gulf? That it was "a fighter plane
descending out of its corridor"? That Pentagon officials finally
admitted it had been "an error"?
Lies. All lies. They were not necessary then. Nor are they now.
It is readily apparent that the machinery is in place for both
Bush and Saddam to save face: First, Bush is safe because Iraq will
have released the hostages and pulled out of Kuwait without appearing
to negotiate. Second, Saddam is safe because (thanks to US behind-the-scenes
arm-twisting) Kuwait will give him access to the Gulf and reparations
for the Rumaila oil fields—which is why he invaded Kuwait
in the first place.
It's sad to see the mess the West has deeded the once-proud Arabs.
Their problems lie in boundaries carved by victors of an earlier
Western war. But it will take more than another to undo what we've
done.
What concerns us now is getting answers to the difficult questions
about the uneasy truce that will usher in the new year, including:
the still unresolved Palestinian problem; the perception that the
still heavily armed and equipped Saddam Hussain still poses a threat
to the area; and Israel's announced readiness to remove Saddam's
war-making potential if the US fails to do so..
The only rational solution to each of these problems is a UN sponsored
international conference.
After all, if access to the Gulf pleases Saddam, his loss of chemical
and nuclear potential should do the same for Israel and a Palestinian
state would do wonders for everybody else.
Even the founding fathers would like that.
George Thompson, a retired foreign service officer, is a nationally
syndicated columnist and television talk show host. |