Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, April 2003, pages
38-40
Demonstrations
Giant Demonstrations Transform Europe
By Martin Sieff
The Atlantic Alliance was already in bad shape before the mass
demonstrations throughout Western Europe Feb. 14. It is in terminal
crisis now.
The problem for the venerable Transatlantic partnership that won
the Cold War is not merely that nearly 4 million people took to
the streets across Western Europe that Saturday to protest the expected
U.S. war on Iraq. It is where the biggest protests took place.
The protests were relatively smaller, though still impressive,
in France, Germany and other countries whose governments had already
come out strongly in opposition to the Bush administration over
Iraq. But they were truly colossal—and unprecedented—in Britain,
Italy and Spain—the three countries whose governments had all defied
Paris and Berlin to support U.S. policy.
That means the political impact of the demonstrations will be
far greater on the very governments that the Bush administration
was relying upon for support. And they look likely to derail even
broader, long-term Bush strategies toward Europe.
For despite fierce French and German opposition to the looming
war, backed by Russia, Bush strategists in the White House, National
Security Council and Department of Defense had been congratulating
themselves over the preceeding two weeks on what they thought were
profound shifts in their favor in Europe.
First, France and Germany were taken by surprise by the decisive
action of 10 European governments, including Britain, Spain, Italy,
Portugal and the new Central European members of the European Union
in breaking with them and supporting America.
This split boosted hopes within the administration and conservative
think tanks supportive of it that France and Germany would not be
able to maintain their traditional domination of the EU, which only
in December expanded from 15 nations to 25 at the Copenhagen summit.
The more pro-American new Central European members, it appeared,
would make common cause with the pro-American governments of Spain
and Italy to split the EU from within and neutralize its traditional
Franco-German power center.
But now the huge protests in Barcelona and Rome—not to mention
the unprecedented colossal one in London—is sending precisely the
opposite message. It is telling the British, Italian and Spanish
governments that their support for the war is massively unpopular
with their own populations and that the policies of France and Germany
are not just popular at home, they also have immense support in
other Western European nations, too.
This news could not have come at a more opportune time for German
Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. He has been reeling in recent weeks
over the heavy-handed way he overplayed his opposition to U.S. policies
on Iraq while the consequences of Schroeder’s failure to pull the
ailing German economy out of its doldrums have dominated domestic
political discussion. Schroeder has just been humiliated by a sweeping
state election loss. And no one doubted that if last September’s
federal elections were held again now, he would go down to sweeping
defeat at the hands of a resurgent Christian Democrat opposition
led by Angela Merkel.
But the scale of the Feb. 14 demonstrations, not just in Berlin,
where half a million people turned out in the biggest German popular
demonstration since the collapse of communism, but throughout the
EU, puts Iraq rather than the economy back on center stage. And
it is likely to give the stumbling Schroeder a new lease on political
life.
The effect of the demonstrations may be even more dire for the
Bush administration in Italy and Spain. Both countries hold key
strategic positions in the Mediterranean and along air supply routes
to the likely Middle East battlefronts. And Bush strategists were
counting on the free use of their air bases in the expected war.
That may still happen. But the governments of Prime Ministers
Silvio Berlusconi in Rome and Jose Maria Aznar in Madrid will now
have to be far more cautious about fully and uncritically cooperating
with Washington. If they go too far, they could even be thrown out
of office by parliamentary rebellions responding to enormous popular
pressure.
The situation is even more dire for Bush’s only fully militarily
supportive major power ally, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain.
Blair was already increasingly isolated and unpopular in his own
restive ruling Labor Party even before Iraq. And polls now show
an extraordinary 90 percent of the British public rejecting his
position on the war. The London demonstration was unprecedented
in its scale. No protest in British history over the last century
and a half came to anything near such a scale—even on domestic matters.
Blair remains determined to send 42,000 British troops to fight
alongside U.S. forces against Iraq. But if the war should drag on
longer than its projected three weeks, should public opinion in
Britain and elsewhere get inflamed over massive civilian Iraqi casualties
or—even worse—if Britain should suffer significant military casualties
in the conflict or be mauled by some new mega-terrorist attack associated
with the war then, as one Labor Party insider told United Press
International, “Blair’s gone.”
It appears increasingly possible, as UPI Editor at Large Arnaud
de Borchgrave has steadily predicted since the Seattle World Trade
Organization protests two and a half years ago, that the scale and
impact of the demonstrations across Europe may see the revival of
the militant left in a new anti-globalist and anti-free trade grouping,
with a power and popularity not seen in over 30 years.
But even if that does not happen, or if it does not happen yet,
February’s demonstrations are already transforming the diplomatic
map of Europe, and in ways that Bush administration planners never
expected and certainly do not want.
Celebrities Join 100,00 in Los Angeles Anti-War Protest
Angelica Houston, Martin Sheen, Jamie Lee Curtis, Mike Farrell,
Gore Vidal and David Clennon were just a few of the celebrities
who gathered Feb. 15 in front of Grauman’s Chinese Theater on Hollywood
Boulevard to march one and a half miles to a military recruitment
center to protest the Bush administration’s build-up for a pre-emptive
war on Iraq.
As the crowds swelled, police admitted as many as 100,000 protesters
were jamming Highland and Sunset Boulevard.
Three demonstrators were dressed in plastic sheeting and duct
tape. Minister John Hickox wore a T-shirt emblazoned, “Old White
Guy Against War.” Other placards read: “There’s a Terrorist Behind
Every Bush,” “Drop Bush Not Bombs,” “Peace Takes Brains,” and “Bush
is to Christianity What Osama is to Islam.”
The massive crowd roared its approval as Gore Vidal took the microphone
on the ANSWER stage at Sunset and Highland.
“The whole world is wondering how the hell we got into this mess,”
stated the caustic author. “Three years ago, we had prosperity.
No matter how corrupt the system has been, we still held onto the
Constitution. I always felt the Republic was on such a firm foundation
we would never see a day like this that we the people would march
against an arbitrary and secret government.”
Dr. Gloria Sanchez of Harbor Medical Center took the podium to
announce that her medical facility, as well as the Downey Rehabilitation
Center, is under threat of closure.
“It will take $1.4 billion to save the health system of Los Angeles,”
she said, “while just one B-2 bomber costs $2 billion, and the government
has allocated $397 billion on warfare. I am a physician and I hear
people’s fears every day.
As the multitude chanted, “Impeach Bush, Impeach Bush, Impeach
Bush,” we chatted with actors Mike Farrell and David Clennon. Earlier,
Fox News had launched a campaign to have Clennon fired from his
role on “The Agency” because he had publicly compared the moral
climate in the U.S. to Hitler’s Germany.
“The response was so ferocious because they have a monopoly on
the media,” Clennon stated, “and it bothers them when people in
the public eye exercise their right of free speech and criticize
this rush to war.”
—Pat McDonnell Twair
Anti-War Impressions
Having arranged with ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism)
to distribute free copies of the Washington Report from one
of their tables at the United for Peace and Justice coalition’s
Feb. 15, New York City anti-war demonstration, I arrived at the
corner of Third Ave. and 50th St. at about 8 a.m. A small group
of dedicated volunteers and organizers had already unloaded boxes
of leaflets calling for a March 15 convergence on the White House,
and a massive emergency walk-out upon news that the war on Iraq
had begun. I helped unload probably 1,000 signs (on expensive cardboard
poles, since the city had deemed cheap wooden stakes unacceptable)
that called for the impeachment of George W. Bush, as well as echoing
the leaflet’s messages. A friend who was also unloading handed me
his Palestinian flag to unfurl, but the police quickly made me put
it away, as it was on a metal flag pole. The pole stood there all
day, flag furled.
When the unloading was finished and everyone had their hands full
of literature to distribute, we waited in the grey cold of the early
Saturday morning New York City streets. Except for the police and
the organizers and volunteers, there was very little movement. A
mere trickle of protestors passed by. As they did, our little group
assailed them, relieved that at least some people had arrived, and
pressed our literature, signs, and stickers into their hands. Several
of the new arrivals expressed reluctance to join the rally for fear
of arrest and deportation.
I began to have serious concerns that the demonstration would
fall flat. Cold and tired, we stood there, wondering if the rumor
we heard about police blocking access was the reason the crowd wasn’t
growing. We sent scouts to other locations to find out what was
happening there. After all, the stage was to be set up several blocks
away, on First Ave., where such speakers as Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
NAACP President Julian Bond, and performers Holly Near, Mos Def
and Harry Belafonte, among others, were to speak out against the
war.
About 11:30 a.m. (the rally was set to start at noon) the trickle
began to swell, but it still looked like the numbers of people turning
out to protest the impending war would be dismal. Then it happened.
The rumors were true—the police had been blocking access—but what
had seemed to be only a few demonstrators were in fact a great number
out in force to raise their collective voice against a war on Iraq.
Overwhelming the police barricades, they took over the streets of
New York.
Suddenly, we couldn’t keep up with the sea of people surrounding
us. White-haired New York matrons mingled with blue jeaned suburban
teens. Exuberant youths of Middle Eastern descent chanted side by
side with men in business suits. Families wheeled toddlers in strollers,
or carried infants in backpacks. Korean and Mexican dance troupes
added music and magic. I saw Native Americans, African Americans,
Euro-Americans, Asian Americans, Latin Americans, Arab Americans,
and a whole range of people whose attire identified them as belonging
to a number of diverse religions.
Jostled by the crowd, I handed out literature as fast as I could
peel it off my frozen fingers, but I was warmed by the crowd, both
physically and emotionally. For three and a half hours movement
was almost impossible in the packed city streets. A policeman I
spoke to said First, Second and Third Avenues were filled from the
mid-70s to about 42nd St.
At around 3 p.m., when the rally was scheduled to end, police
took advantage of some people’s departure to regain control of the
streets. Though mostly peaceful, there were 320 arrests, and some
pepper spraying on the corner where I had spent the day. The dispersal
of what the police called 500,000 and NBC called 1,000,000 protestors
took about two hours and forced subway entrances to close periodically,
as they were jammed beyond capacity. What I had feared would be
a pathetically small gathering turned into the biggest anti-war
demonstration yet. —Sara Powell
Martin Sieff is a senior news analyst with United Press International.
This article first appeared Feb. 17, 2003. Copyright © 2001-2003
United Press International. Reprinted with permission. |