Washington Report, January/February 2006, pages 46-47
Canada Calling
American Conscientious Objector Wins Right to Appeal Refugee Board
Ruling
By Faisal Kutty
 |
 |
| Members of the Coalition Against Israel’s
War Crimes demonstrate in Toronto Nov. 14 as part of a public
rally protesting the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon (Photo Himy Syed). |
| |
|
A FEDERAL court in Toronto has agreed to hear an appeal from an
American soldier turned down for refugee status in Canada after
refusing to serve in Iraq. If he is sent back to the U.S., Jeremy
Hinzman faces a court martial and the possibility of up to five
years in jail as a deserter.
Hinzman joined the elite infantry division, the 82nd Airborne,
about three years ago. He served in a noncombat role in Afghanistan
and was later turned down by the military brass as a conscientious
objector. When, on his subsequent return to the U.S., he learned
that he would be deployed in Iraq, he decided to cross the border
into Canada in early 2004. He is currently living in Toronto with
his wife, Nga Nguyen, and son, Liam.
The Rapid City, South Dakota native believes that the U.S. attack
on Iraq is illegal under international law and that he would be
a party to war crimes if he participated.
In March 2005, Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board turned
down Hinzman’s refugee claim. The former soldier’s
lawyer, Jeffrey House, had argued that the 27-year-old Hinzman
would be punished for acting on his conscience.
The board, however, found that Hinzman did not qualify as a conscientious
objector. The adjudicator also held that he was not convinced that
the ex-soldier would face persecution in the U.S. if forced to
return. The board, which has never accepted a refugee from the
United States, has stated in the past that America is not a “refugee
producing” country.
In denying Hinzman’s claim, the adjudicator opined that
the legal status of the war in Iraq had no bearing on the case.
One of the issues on which Hinzman’s appeal is based is the
question of whether this decision not to consider the legality
of the war amounted to an error in law.
The politically sensitive case is being closely monitored by authorities
in Canada and the U.S. Indeed, the case has become the proverbial
public relations “hot potato” for American authorities.
At the hearing, a former U.S. Marine testifying in Hinzman’s
support stated that American soldiers in Iraq routinely violated
international law by killing unarmed women, children and other
Iraqi civilians.
Canadian supporters say that hundreds of U.S. soldiers may be
in the country and that at least 20 of them are trying to gain
refugee status. Profiles of a few of them are available online
at <http://www.resisters.ca/resisters_stories.html>.
Lee Zaslofsky of the War Resisters Support Campaign called the
federal court ruling a “real breakthrough” for U.S.
resisters. “This is very good,” Zaslofsky told the
press. “It will have an impact on all the other cases.”
The matter will be heard by Federal Court Justice Sean Harrington
on Feb. 7 in Toronto. According to attorney House, if his arguments
are successful the court likely will refer the matter back to the
board (to a different adjudicator or panel) for further consideration.
Justice Harrington may also provide specific instructions on dealing
with the contested issues, House said, principally the legality
of the war in Iraq.
“The best possible outcome,” he said, “is that
we get a full hearing in which all our arguments are considered.”
Both House and Zaslofsky are Vietnam-era war resisters who settled
in Canada.
A new film on war resisters, “Let Them Stay,” will
screen in Toronto on Dec. 10. The film, narrated by Shirley Douglas
and produced and directed by Alex Lisman, features one-on-one interviews
with U.S. war resisters, documenting their life-changing experiences
in Iraq and the hidden realities of U.S. military recruitment and
warfare. It also documents the War Resisters Support Campaign,
a pan-Canadian coalition working with the war resisters to put
pressure on the federal government to allow these former soldiers
to remain in the country.
A number of resisters, including Darrell Anderson, Patrick and
Jill Hart, Hinzman, Brandon Hughey, and Ryan and Jen Johnson will
attend the premiere.
For more information, contact the War Resisters Support Campaign
by phone,: (416) 598-1222 or e-mail, <resisters@sym
patico.ca>.
Faisal Kutty is a Toronto-based lawyer and writer whose articles
are archived at <www.faisalkutty.com>.
He can be reached at <wrmea@faisalkutty.com>.
SIDEBAR
Ode to a Canadian Friend of Palestine, Jim Graff (1937-2005)
James Graff, a professor of moral and political philosophy
at the University of Toronto’s Victoria College
for 40 years, died of cancer Oct. 23, 2005. Shortly before
his death, he helped organize the Sabeel conference on
morally responsible investment held in Toronto Oct. 26
to 29 (see report on p. 60 of this issue). Born in East
Orange, NJ, he earned his B.A. at Lafayette College in
Easton, PA, and his master’s and Ph.D. from Brown
University. A longtime activist on behalf of the Palestinian
cause, in 1984 he established the Near East Cultural
and Education Foundation of Canada (NECEF), which, beginning
in 1986, he represented for 10 years on the North American
Coordinating Committee for NGOs on the Question of Palestine.
Graff served as vice chair of that organization as well,
which met at U.N. headquarters in New York, except for
two meetings in Montreal and Toronto, Canada that he
initiated. The author of Palestinian Children and
Israeli State Violence, he was a prime mover
of and inspiration to Canada’s peace and justice
community. He is survived by his wife, Aida, daughter,
Noha, son, Hani, and his brother.
October 24, 2005
Dear Friend,
It is with sorrow and sadness that I learn that you left
us to claim your eternal resting place in the heavens,
Jim. It is difficult to conceive of a solidarity movement
and activism in Toronto without you. Indeed it is difficult
to imagine Canada without Jim. Soon after I came to Canada
and found my way through its web of activism and solidarity
fury that came about in support of the Palestinian intifada
of December 1987, I heard your name. I arrived in Canada
a few days after the intifada began. In Toronto, an intifada
of solidarity was brewing and you were at the core of it.
I saw you speak many times, read your articles and enjoyed
a cigarette and a drink with you once or twice. It was
not until 1991 at York University where you spoke about
Palestine and I had the privilege of introducing you that
I realized that you are no ordinary man. Ever since, I
have been a great admirer of yours. It is difficult to
exaggerate the tremendous impact that you had on me personally,
but more importantly on the question of Palestine. Your
seminal work, Palestinian Children and Israeli State
Violence, was a ground-breaking chronicle of the impact
on children of Israeli occupation and Israeli soldiers’ behaviors.
Whether in Toronto, doing your many things, or in New
York attending the United Nations North American NGO conference
on Palestine, or in Gaza or Ramallah visiting with friends
and many projects you created and supported, you have been
one of this country’s most faithful supporters of
Palestine, justice and human rights.
For that we Palestinians are most fortunate—indeed,
very lucky to have had you as one of our supporters.
Jim, we may have been less grateful than you truly deserve.
We did not tell you enough how much we admired your undying
love for justice and human rights. Often, some of us were
disgraceful in their disagreements with you. But today
all of us are in mourning. As many of us often joked, you,
Jim, have been Toronto’s best Palestinian.
Your gentle passion and eloquent commitment to Palestine
remarkably moved many of us in the Palestinian Arab community.
We will miss your presence on countless planning committees
for conferences, like the upcoming Sabeel conference on
divestment. We will miss you bringing to Toronto and introducing
stellar speakers like Noam Chomsky and your final guest
on Oct. 3, David Barsamian. I am delighted that I had the
chance to see you that evening and shake your hand. You
did say you were not well. I only regret not knowing how
ill you were. I probably would have told you, in addition
to I love you, thank you.
Thank you for every meeting you attended on behalf of
Palestine and for Palestinians, for every lecture you delivered,
for each speaker you brought from Palestine and the world
over and for hosting receptions for them at your house.
Thank you for every intervention you made at the U.N. during
the meetings of the coordinating committee of the North
American NGO on Palestine. Thanks for every page you wrote.
For every book you reviewed, every newsletter you edited,
thank you. For every dollar you raised for Palestine, simply
thank you.
I will miss many things about you for sure, Jim. But most
of all I will miss your tender walk and your cane; I will
miss your trademark shirts with many pockets. I will miss
your spectacles and blond mustache.
Surely, Jim, there is much much more to you than your
work on Palestine. Today, however, I want to claim you
as ours and only ours.
Your family lost a beloved husband and father. Our thoughts
and prayers are with them, especially with Aida.
With your passing Palestine has lost a friend, a champion,
a human giant and a passionate lover. I will remember you
with a smile each time I am part of a planning committee
for an event on Palestine. Jim, our next meeting on the “Made
in Palestine” art project is in two weeks. You attended
the first two, and I know you will be with us until the
end.
Jim, Palestinians should—I hope we will—name
a mountain after you in Palestine.
Rest in peace, my friend.
Jehad Aliweiwi
Board Member, Muslim Canadian Congress, Toronto |
|